Skip Navigation

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1993 18(2):129-145; doi:10.1093/jmp/18.2.129
© 1993 by Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bayley, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bayley, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1993 by The Society for Health and Human Values

Homeopathy

Carol Bayley, Ph.D.

Mercy Health Services Corp. 34605 Twelve Mile Road, Farminglon Hills, ML, 48331, U.S.A.


   Abstract

Homeopathy is a form of complementary medicine which relies heavily on observation and experience. The three distinguishing characteristics of homeopathy are that remedies are prescribed on the totality of a person's symptoms, that the remedy likely to cure a person is a dilution of that substance which would cause the same symptoms in a healthy person, and that remedies are prepared using microdoses of substances which are diluted and then vigorously shaken. Mainstream medicine criticizes homeopathy by saying that its gentleness has outlived its usefulness and treatment successes are probably no more than placebo action. In addition, its critics charge that homeopathy is unscientific, runs counter to the "laws of nature" and will not stand up to scientific scrutiny. Homeopaths reply that mainstream medicine is dangerous, that homeopathy works in children and animals (usually thought resistant to placebo), and that several good controlled clinical trials have shown positive results. There is a difference between showing that homeopathy works and adequately accounting for its mechanism of action. Clinical trials have concentrated on the former and remain unexplained in the latter.

Keywords: complementary medicine, empirical homeopathy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
A. C. C. Lee and K. J. Kemper
Homeopathy and Naturopathy: Practice Characteristics and Pediatric Care
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, January 1, 2000; 154(1): 75 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Fam MedHome page
Practice and Policy Guidelines Panel, National Ins
Clinical Practice Guidelines in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: An Analysis of Opportunities and Obstacles
Arch Fam Med, March 1, 1997; 6(2): 149 - 154.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.