Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Advance Access originally published online on June 23, 2009
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2009 34(4):384-408; doi:10.1093/jmp/jhp026
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Docile Bodies: Transnational Research Ethics as Biopolitics
Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
Address correspondence to: M. Therese Lysaught, PhD, Department of Theology, Marquette University, Coughlin Hall 116, Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881, USA. E-mail: therese.lysaught{at}marquette.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
This essay explores the claim that bioethics has become a mode of biopolitics. It seeks to illuminate one of the myriad of ways that bioethics joins other institutionalized discursive practices in the task of producing, organizing, and managing the bodies—of policing and controlling populations—in order to empower larger institutional agents. The focus of this analysis is the contemporary practice of transnational biomedical research. The analysis is catalyzed by the enormous transformation in the political economy of transnational research that has occurred over the past three decades and the accompanying increase in the numbers of human bodies now subjected to research. This essay uses the work of Michel Foucault, particularly his notion of docile bodies, to analyze these changes. Two loci from the bioethics literature are explored—one treating research in the United States and one treating research in developing countries. In the latter, we see a novel dynamic of the new biopolitics: the ways in which bioethics helps to create docile political bodies that will police themselves and who will, in turn, facilitate the production of docile human bodies for research.
Keywords: bioethics, biopolitics, bodies, developing countries, docile bodies, Foucault, resource-limited contexts, transnational research
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. P. Bishop Revisiting Foucault J Med Philos, August 1, 2009; 34(4): 323 - 327. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
