Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Advance Access published online on December 11, 2008
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, doi:10.1093/jmp/jhn030
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redefining Disability: Maleficent, Unjust and Inconsistent
California State University-Chico, Chico, California, USA
California State University-Chico, Chico, California, USA
Address correspondence to: Becky Cox-White, PhD, California State University-Chico, Department of Philosophy, 121 Trinity Hall, California State University, Chico, CA 95929 USA. E-mail: bcwhite{at}csuchico.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
Disability activists' redefinition of "disability" as a social, rather than a medical, problem attempts to reassign causality. We explicate the untenable implications of this approach and argue this definition is maleficent, unjust, and inconsistent. Thus, redefining disability as a socially caused phenomenon is, from a moral point of view, ill-advised.
Keywords: disability, genetic screening, justice, preimplantation genetic diagnosis
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. E. Hinkley "How Are We Defining Our Terms Here?": The Defining the Semantic Meaning of Terms in Bioethical Debates J Med Philos, January 15, 2009; (2009) jhn034v1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
